Editing Tasks (to do)

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
Wiki needs a cleanup for Task related/To do items and any other pages.
:: '''[[Website Development Job Description for Redesign]]'''
:: '''[[Website Development Job Description for Redesign]]'''
;Task management Finalization:
# Look at original Job Description (to see that implementation)
# Look at our new design's Home page and Task Detail page
# Think of anything new that would be needed
# Create the system diagram to show the flow for Tasks


* Look at Decision making in a group (aspects: consensus, avoiding authoritarian actions, efficiency etc)
* Think about flow/logic for Task management. Edit this: https://javul.org/wiki/Website_Development_Job_Description_for_Redesign
* Think about flow/logic for Task management. Edit this: https://javul.org/wiki/Website_Development_Job_Description_for_Redesign
* Check previous Task management functionality
* Check previous Task management functionality
Line 14: Line 8:
* Look at Task management flow and operations
* Look at Task management flow and operations
* Alerts for items requiring attention (how the flow works) e.g. Task Evaluation, Completion, Task Assigned, Task Accepted (after completion)
* Alerts for items requiring attention (how the flow works) e.g. Task Evaluation, Completion, Task Assigned, Task Accepted (after completion)
* Look at Decision making in a group (aspects: consensus, avoiding authoritarian actions, efficiency etc)
** Vote weight according to past contributions (awards received etc)?. For new users (less than 50 points, 0.2x  and so on). Need to make a lookup table


Forum:
Forum:
Line 25: Line 17:
* Think about Forum .. how to divide
* Think about Forum .. how to divide
* Donation Options (review previous and plan for this one)
* Donation Options (review previous and plan for this one)
* Distribution of funds available for activity points (e.g. if $1000 is available, we can only keep $100 for activity points e.g. a user who has 20% of all activity points can be awarded 20% of the $100. And the rest for tasks). Need to decide on the specifics
* Distribution of funds available for activity points (e.g. if $1000 is available, we can only keep $100 for activity points and the rest for tasks). Need to decide on the specifics
* Design of Payment and Distribution system
* Design of Payment and Distribution system
* (maybe) Get hired help from Bubble.io export to make prototype
* (maybe) Get hired help from Bubble.io export to make prototype
Line 32: Line 24:
* Government and Leadership (new sub-project)
* Government and Leadership (new sub-project)
** Ask for help from Political Science (1) post on reddit on politics related sub-reddits (2) try Upwork for consulting advice from political experts
** Ask for help from Political Science (1) post on reddit on politics related sub-reddits (2) try Upwork for consulting advice from political experts
* Issue Resolution Rate: For Statistics, we want to keep a total number for all of history, and also for the last 6 months.
* Unit:  State: Active, Archived (changed by site admin) [internally 0,1]. Display this field only if Archived   


;Things to think about:
;Things to think about:
Line 74: Line 64:
*Participatory Budgeting  
*Participatory Budgeting  
* .. others
* .. others
==After deployment==
* The 'System improvements' Unit should have seperate forums for Products/Services, and Govt/Leadership
* '''Referral system''': (users being rewarded if they recruit good contributors). Need to decide/design something that works
* '''Rewards for Task creators''': It is challenging to create well-defined viable tasks so it is important to reward those who work on creating and editing tasks. Some reward should/will be given before tasks are completed and a larger portion of reward will be given if a task is completed. For these reasons it is in the best interests of the task creators to make tasks that can be completed. Rewards could be 10% of the task’s completion award amount given separately. So if the task completer gets $100, the task creator will get $10. In case of multiple task editors, the task completer can decide how to split their reward depending on who contributed the most to the creation of the task. Need to see if the User activity points takes care of this in some way
* '''Decision Making module''': Also need to be a wiki object. Voting but it has to be supported with researched reasoned arguments. Need some guidelines so its not divisive/partisan etc but rather as objective/rational as possible
* Need private messaging for users, and also a public message board for each other (like Wikipedia)


==Page Views==
==Page Views==
Line 87: Line 70:
** Units, Issues, Objectives, Tasks
** Units, Issues, Objectives, Tasks
** Task Management pages
** Task Management pages
==Wiki Functionality/Requirements==
[https://docs.google.com/document/d/18OmpmhZajR7Hwivq8P4g-iqO-8tO5AoaMR5YMlESb7M/edit#heading=h.3r6ljkccanm5 Old FWC Description]
*
Please note that all contributions to Javul are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (see Javul:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)